Биткоин-пазл в картинке
1KfZGvwZxsvSmemoCmEV75uqcNzYBHjkHZ
#1
22 мая 2025 в 09:27
#2
25 мая 2025 в 11:28
Я пристально слежу за этой головоломкой с 2021 года, стремясь отыскать ключ к ее решению и перепробовал уже множество гипотез. Возможно, дело даже не в сид-фразе, а в некоторой более сложной комбинации. Для тех, кто заинтересовался, оригинальный пост доступен по ссылке: https://www.reddit.com/user/stsh_n/comments/j79zvj/bitcoin_puzzle_2000.
#3
25 мая 2025 в 17:07
SEED PHRASE IN THE THIS PICTURE
WELCOME TO THE BRAVE NEW WORLD
Левая часть изображения
- Статуя Свободы:
- На книге: BLM
- Под пьедесталом: ONLY REAL BITCOIN
- Рядом текст: 1865–202...?
Флаг США (инвертированные цвета):
- Рядом слово: STOP (буква O — знак мирного протеста)
Биткоин адрес (вдоль левого края):
- 1KfZGvwZxsvSmemoCmEV75uqcNzYBHjkHZ
За людьми в масках (в верхней части):
- Order and Stability
Центрая часть изображения
Внутри круга с пирамидой и глазом:
- ANNUIT COEPTIS
- NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM
- E PLURIBUS UNUM
- CONSCIOUS RESET GAMER
Правая чаcть изображения
Джордж Флойд (подпись на худи):
- 05.25.20
- I CAN’T BREATHE
Текст рядом (разноцветный):
- BLACK LIVES MATTER
- NO JUSTICE NO PEACE
- END POLICE BRUTALITY
- STOP KILLING US
- NOT ONE MORE
Монумент с окровавленной головой:
- Надпись на постаменте: FUCK THIS SHIT
- На шее статуи написано BREATHE
- На постаменте подчеркнут
SUBJECT
Два кандидата (Трамп vs. Байден):
- Красный вопросительный знак между ними
- Подпись: vs. 11.03.20
Серый текст под изображением:
- Esse quam niger es, sic dixit caccabus olla
Строка в самом низу изображения:
…when they were received, the payee needs proof, that at the time of each transaction the majority of nodes agreed it was the first confederation
The problem of course is the payee can't verify that one of the owners did not double-spend
the coin. A common solution is to introduce a trusted central authority, or mint, that checks every
transaction for double spending. After each transaction, the coin must be returned to the mint to
issue a new coin, and only coins issued directly from the mint are trusted not to be double-spent.
The problem with this solution is that the fate of the entire money system depends on the
company running the mint, with every transaction having to go through them, just like a bank.
We need a way for the payee to know that the previous owners did not sign any earlier
transactions. For our purposes, the earliest transaction is the one that counts, so we don't care
about later attempts to double-spend. The only way to confirm the absence of a transaction is to
be aware of all transactions. In the mint based model, the mint was aware of all transactions and
decided which arrived first. To accomplish this without a trusted party, transactions must be
publicly announced [1], and we need a system for participants to agree on a single history of the
order in which they were received. The payee needs proof that at the time of each transaction, the
majority of nodes agreed it was the first received.
the coin. A common solution is to introduce a trusted central authority, or mint, that checks every
transaction for double spending. After each transaction, the coin must be returned to the mint to
issue a new coin, and only coins issued directly from the mint are trusted not to be double-spent.
The problem with this solution is that the fate of the entire money system depends on the
company running the mint, with every transaction having to go through them, just like a bank.
We need a way for the payee to know that the previous owners did not sign any earlier
transactions. For our purposes, the earliest transaction is the one that counts, so we don't care
about later attempts to double-spend. The only way to confirm the absence of a transaction is to
be aware of all transactions. In the mint based model, the mint was aware of all transactions and
decided which arrived first. To accomplish this without a trusted party, transactions must be
publicly announced [1], and we need a system for participants to agree on a single history of the
order in which they were received. The payee needs proof that at the time of each transaction, the
majority of nodes agreed it was the first received.